Assignment 4: Applying lighting techniques.

“Light is the essence of photography. Knowledgeable photographers realise that they are not photographing objects, but rather light and the way it delineates objects or is emitted by them. Photography is the study of light, the perception of light, and the interpretation of light. Lines, forms and shapes appear because of the way light reveals those compositional elements, not solely because of the forms themselves.”

Bruce Barnbaum

‘The Art of Photography’ 2010 p 67

I have decided on the following eight photographs for this final piece of work for assignment 4: 'Light'. As discussed in an earlier post, I decided to treat Avebury as 'one object' because that is how I experienced this stone circle. Plus the fact that, however interesting individual images might be, photographing a single stone has its limitations...!

Shape

ISO 100   f9    1/800

Light coming from behind, providing contrast and a clear sense of the edges of the stone.

Thinking about the choice for this particular image, I now know where the subconscious inspiration comes from... 

As a kid I watched '2001: a space odyssey' no less than and a half times! (the 'half' because I had grown up a bit and thought that clocking eight visits to a cinema to see the same film - however visually enthralling it might have been - was one visit too many!). But the above picture is a direct echo of the monolith featured throughout the film, whether at sunrise or in space. 

I hesitate to call it 'iconic', but that's what it is for me. In fact, when I look through all the photos I took on this visit to all things Neolithic, there are several where I have actually positioned the camera so that the sun seems to be rising above the stones. I clearly won't be letting go of this visual memory any time soon!

In this image, converted like some of those that follow into black and white in order to concentrate on essential pictorial elements, I like the very darkness of the stone as it emphasises its shape and solidity.

ISO 100    f8    1/200

Light coming from the left, showing shape and contrast, as well a hint of form, via the illuminated left side of the two stones.

In this photograph, the accent is once more on the shape of the two objects. There is also a suggested relationship between the two megaliths themselves. Without the presence of a human figure to give some idea of scale, it is difficult to get an idea of the actual element of 'mega' that these two objects have. Close up, one really begins to wonder about how these huge stones were cut, dressed, transported and placed in this landscape. And why...

Talking of landscape, that is one of the reasons I didn't crop out the background - I wanted the image to say something about the context of where these objects are.

Form

These two pictures are from the same section of the circle: the above image is a closer view of an individual stone in the circle - what remains of it - seen below. 

ISO 100    f8   1/200

Light falling from the right, creating both a shadow and a definite feeling of form and weight.

This photograph gives a sense of the shape, weight and feel of the object. It is probably a lot rougher than it seems here. There is also a slight nudge in the direction of the question as to what would happen if it fell over - and we were too close...! The shadow gives an impression of something really solid - which of course it is. I like the fact that here there is no evidence of anything 21st century - the stone is as it would have been 4000 years ago. The link between the tree and the stone could be that they are equal partners in this setting.

ISO 100    f9    1/250

Here we can see two sets of form: one is the form of individual stones and the other is that of the circle itself. While these particular stones are not on a par with the large-scale megaliths at Avebury, they none the less have their own distinctive character. I notice now that each one is different.

Harking back to our earlier studies about composition, I am conscious  of the elements of horizontals, verticals, triangles and curves. I can also see an unexpected addition to the image: the crow - or rook - perched on the nearest stone. These birds are probably the truest and most constant inhabitants and guardians of this ancient place.

The second photograph seems to be saying: 'this is what we are here for - to stand in this circle for our purpose...' What that purpose is we can only guess at, but we cannot know with any certainty. There are many theories and stories attached to this phenomenon and they all have their place, adding the deep enigma of Avebury.

Colour

ISO 100    f9    1/250

Light shining from behind the camera and a bit to the left.

This may seem a somewhat ill-chosen image for the section of colour of the object, but I wanted to set the colour character of a representative stone into the palette of the wider landscape. As you can see we are in an image made up of green, yellow, blue and a dash of grey. Even though the stone in this photograph is grey, it is possible to make out hints or impressions of green on its surface. 

Once more, we are taken back to our earlier studies, this time to the assignment on 'colour'. Here are examples of the interplay between complimentary colours. Also, we are reminded of composition - this time due to the placing of the stone, as it balances with the track in the opposite corner of the picture. The tracks have probably been here as long as the stones. 

The feel of this whole area is wide and expansive and this image acknowledges that element.

ISO 100   f8    1/250

Light shining from above and to the left, eliciting colour in both the stone and the grass, as well as producing shadows that speak of form and texture.

The colours shown in this picture are an intense encounter with all that was said above. What we have in addition is the sense of shape and form, in amongst the balanced colours of green, pale blue and grey. The light is still falling almost vertically and probably has nothing in the way of colour itself. As mentioned above, a later hour would have been preferable for shadows, especially on the surface features of the stone above.

Texture

ISO 100    f8    1/125

Light coming from the right and above, doing all the important work in revealing the very rough and 'sharp' textural surface.

This is where a feeling mystery emerges: from a distance, the megaliths look mainly smooth, with perhaps a little roughness thrown in. Yes, there are some distinctly strange configurations on certain of the stones, but in the main they seem like ordinary blocks of granite.

However, on closer inspection, the story is very different. Almost every stone has its own, individual surface characteristics. Here, we see two examples. The one above shows a pitted, almost 'cratered' surface. 

In the photograph below we see evidence of weathering and the growth of various forms of lichen. What made the larger indentations in the right of the image, only time knows: we can but guess and wonder.

ISO 100    f4    1/400

Light falling from the right and above, serving to bring out the far-from-smooth surface and lots of eveidence of weathering.